AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 26:2:62-69 (1975)
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Van Wyk, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Van Wyk, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Van Wyk, C. J.

Composition and Sensory Qualities of Wines Prepared from White Grapes by Fermentation with and without Grape Solids

V. L. Singleton 1, H. A. Sieberhagen 1, P. De Wet 1, and C. J. Van Wyk 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis.

Wines were prepared from seven harvests representing six white grape varieties. The must of each harvest was divided into 3 or 5 equivalent lots. Lots were fermented dry at 16 C from juice clarified by settling, from turbid juice with double the normal amount of suspended solids, and from the entire destemmed, crushed grape mass inoculated with yeast and maintained in contact with the pomace for 24, 48, or 120 hours.

The expert panel of tasters judged wines prepared from clarified juice to be much higher in quality and desirable aroma than any of the other wines. Chemical analyses were essentially identical for the wines prepared from clarified juice or turbid juice, but the wines from turbid juice were much lower in quality and considered harsher (higher ratings for astringency and bitterness). The major quality difference between wines from these two treatments was due to the fresh, clean, delicate, fruity, characteristic odor called fermentation bouquet in wines from the clarified samples and its decrease or absence, plus off odors (particularly hydrogen sulfide) in wines from the turbid samples. The wines with increasing pomace contact exhibited increasing total phenol content coupled with increasing astringency rating. Pomace contact sufficient to give additional total phenol (as gallic acid) of about 100 mg/L from grape solids of seeded white grapes gave just recognizably increased astringency in white table wines. The wines with up to 5 days of pomace contact during fermentation at low temperature did not resemble red wines in flavor or odor, but remained similar to normal dry white wines, although with generally lower quality. Bitterness ratings did not parallel astringency or phenol content, and there appeared to be higher bitterness in intermediate levels of pomace contact and phenol content.

Accepted on March 6, 1975




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Food Science and Technology InternationalHome page
P. Hernandez Orte, A. Guitart, V. Ferreira, J. Gracia, and J. Cacho
Effect of maceration time and the addition of enzymes on the amino acid composition of musts and wines and its influence on wine aroma Influencia del tiempo de maceracion y de la adicion de enzimas sobre la composicion de los aminoacidos de mostos y vinos y su relacion con el aroma
Food Science and Technology International, January 1, 1998; 4(6): 407 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.