AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 26:4:175-178 (1975)
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, W. M.

Effect of Pruning Severity on the Growth and Fruit Production of 'Thompson Seedless' Grapevines

L. A. Lider 1, A. N. Kasimatis 2, and W. M. Kliewer 2

1 Department of Viticulture, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
2 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

A study was initiated in 1970 to evaluate the effects of different levels of pruning severity on vine growth, crop production and fruit maturity.

The pruning levels of own-rooted 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines were selected from a close visual examination by three experienced pruners of a group of 160 test vines. The variation in pruning level shown by these pruners was taken as the range in pruning severity for the experiment: 9, 15, and 22 nodes per kilogram of dormant one-year-old prunings. The assigned pruning severities were maintained for the five years of the study, with the total node count per vine varying seasonally as total prunings varied.

The variability in pruning weight, as an indication of seasonal vine growth, in this block of vigorous young vines was considerable, ranging from 1.4 to 6.8 kg per vine. The variability in pruner judgment on the number of 15-node canes to retain on vines of equal size was also considerable (3 to 5 canes). The number of nodes retained on a vine in relation to its size as determined by weight of dormant prunings affected both crop load and vegetative growth in the following summer, thereby affecting the rate of maturity of the fruit harvested.

Accepted on September 29, 1975







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.