AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48:1:93-99 (1997)
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biricolti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vignozzi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Biricolti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vignozzi, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Biricolti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vignozzi, N.

VAM Fungi and Soil Lime Content Influence Rootstock Growth and Nutrient Content

Stefano Biricolti 1, Francesco Ferrini 1, Enrico Rinaldelli 1, Ivano Tamantini 2, and Nadia Vignozzi 1

1 Dipartimento di Ortoflorofrutticoltura, Università di Firenze, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Firenze, Italy
2 Istituto Agronomico per I'Oltremare, Ministero degli Affari Esteri, via Cocchi 4, 50131 Firenze, Italy.

A factorial experiment was conducted to determine the interaction between vesicular-arbuscular fungi (VAF) inoculation (Glomus constrictus Trappe, G. deserticola Trappe, Blosse, and Menge, G. mosseae Nicol. and Gerd.) and soil lime content (0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% active lime). A control without fungus inoculum was set up for each medium. The mycorrhizal plants showed overall greater root and shoot growth than the control, independently of the soil lime content, and G. mosseae and G. constrictus caused greater vegetative development than G. deserticola. However, plant growth was reduced by increasing soil lime content. The absence of significant interactions between the two factors of variability (fungi x lime concentration) on vegetative growth suggests that mycorrhization, while increasing vine growth, does not reduce grapevine susceptibility to calcium carbonate. Leaf chlorosis was found to be significantly higher in leaves of the inoculated cuttings, its incidence being greater at the higher lime rates. Leaf chlorophyll content (µg/mg) was reduced by VAM, while chlorophyll content per leaf area unit was also inversely correlated to lime concentration in the substrate. Leaf mineral content was not influenced by soil lime, except for magnesium which decreased with increased lime concentration. Inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi influenced the mineral content of P, Mn, and B and to a lesser extent Zn and Cu.

Key words: grapevine, VA mycorrhiza, lime

Submitted on June 14, 1995







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.