AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48:2:220-224 (1997)
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuiskunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehtonen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuiskunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehtonen, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tuiskunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehtonen, P.

Determination of the Alcoholic Strength of Grape and Fruit Wines by Simple Analytical Methods

Minna Tuiskunen 1 and Pekka Lehtonen 2

1 Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, Viikki B, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
2 Alcohol Control Laboratory (ACL), Alko Group Inc., P.O. Box 350, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland.

Different types of grape and fruit wines were analyzed for alcoholic strength. Alcoholic strength was determined by three different, simple methods: areometric, boiling point, and Rebelein's method. The areometric method proved to be the most reliable means of the three methods tested for determining the alcoholic strength of any type of wine. The observed alcohol contents by volume deviated by 0.0 to 0.8 percentage points from the reference values, and the correlation with the reference method was high (correlation coefficient, R = 0.98). The boiling point method was good for table wines (alcoholic strength 9% to 12.5% by volume). For sweet dessert wines, however, the deviation of the boiling point method was large (> 1 percentage point % vol). Because sugar content affects the boiling point of wine, the boiling point method cannot be used for sweet dessert wines without calibration and use of a quadratic equation. Rebelein's method was unreliable because of its poor repeatability. The difference between two parallel determinations of alcohol was up to one percentage point % vol, whereas for other methods the corresponding figure was 0 to 0.2% vol. The analytical differences were correlated vs. total acids, dry extract and sugar content in the samples tested. Correlations were poor except the correlation of analytical difference obtained with the boiling point method vs. sugar content or dry extract, in which cases the correlations were reasonable with R = 0.84 and 0.79, respectively.

Key words: wine, fruit wine, alcoholic strength, extract, areometer, boiling point

Submitted on January 8, 1996







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.