AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48:3:303-309 (1997)
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maujean, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marchal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maujean, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marchal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maujean, A.

Quantification of Interferences in the Direct Measurement of Proteins in Wines From the Champagne Region Using the Bradford Method

Richard Marchal 1, Valerie Seguin 1, and Alain Maujean 1

1 Laboratoire d'Oenologie - Faculté des Sciences de Reims, Moulin de la Housse B.P. 1039, 51687 Reims Cedex 2, France

At this time, the Bradford method is the most commonly used method in enology for direct protein quantification because of its rapidity and its reproducibility. This paper considers interferences which may falsify the estimation of protein in champagne Pinot noir and Chardonnay wines. Ultrafiltration with 10 kDa MWCO membrane shows that nonprotein compounds largely react with the Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) and can produce an A595 nm equal to 30% to 90% of the initial value. Ethanol and exogenous and endogenous phenolic compounds are principally responsible for these interferences. They act indirectly favoring the neutral form of the dye. However, interferences from ethanol and phenolics are not additive. Furthermore, the interaction is negative. Gelatins used in enology react 50 times less than BSA with the dye reagent. Both bentonite and vegetable charcoal treatments partially eliminate proteins and phenolics. The ratios A520 nm/A595 nm (eq. BSA estimated by the direct Bradford method) increases on increasing bentonite fining and decreases on charcoal treatment. For these reasons, the deproteinization effects of enological treatments are, at present, very difficult to estimate with direct measurement. A modified Bradford method involving of A595 nm before and after ultrafiltration (3 and 10 kDa MWCO) is proposed as a more accurate measure of wine protein content.

Key words: protein estimation, Bradford assay, white wine, enological treatments

Submitted on September 8, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
S. Vincenzi, S. Mosconi, G. Zoccatelli, C. D. Pellegrina, G. Veneri, R. Chignola, A. Peruffo, A. Curioni, and C. Rizzi
Development of a New Procedure for Protein Recovery and Quantification in Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2005; 56(2): 182 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. Cabello-Pasini, N. Victoria-Cota, V. Macias-Carranza, E. Hernandez-Garibay, and R. Muniz-Salazar
Clarification of Wines Using Polysaccharides Extracted from Seaweeds
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2005; 56(1): 52 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.