AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48:4:521-524 (1997)
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uyemoto, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rowhani, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Uyemoto, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rowhani, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Uyemoto, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rowhani, A.

An Improved Purification Procedure for Grapevine Leafroll Associated Viruses

Jerry K. Uyemoto 1, C. Randall Krag 1, and Adib Rowhani 2

1 USDA-ARS University of California, Davis CA 95616.
2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis CA 95616.

Higher yields of purified grapevine leafroll associated viruses (GLRaV) types 1 and 2 were consistently realized when an acidic extraction buffer [0.5 M potassium phosphate, pH 6.4; 4% polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (PVPP), without bentonite] was used. In contrast, yield of purified viruses was problematical using 0.5 M Tris- HCl buffer, pH 8.2, PVPP, either with or without bentonite. Relative virus yields were determined by ELISA. The consistency in virus yields was probably due to increased activity of the polyphenol absorbent, PVPP, when it was suspended in a slightly acidic solution. For GLRaV-3, yields of purified virus were somewhat comparable irrespective of extraction buffer or bentonite.

Submitted on November 18, 1996







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.