AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:3:351-358 (1999)
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bell, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bell, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, A.

Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Growth, Canopy Density, and Yield of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon

Sally-Jean Bell 1 and Alan Robson 2

1 Agriculture Western Australia, P.O. Box 1231, Bunbury, WA 6231, Australia
2 The University of Western Australia. Nedlands, Perth, WA 6907, Australia.

sallybell{at}agric.wa.gov.au

The effect of nitrogen supply on the vegetative and reproductive capacity of vines of low nitrogen status was investigated in a field trial conducted in Western Australia. Five rates of nitrogen fertilizer (0, 50, 100, 200, and 400 g N/vine) were applied to irrigated, 12-year-old Cabernet Sauvignon vines over three seasons. Two-thirds of the nitrogen was applied late budbreak and the rest at two weeks after flowering. Moderate rates of nitrogen fertilization stimulated vine growth and vigor (shoot extension rate) resulting in an increase in canopy density. Prior to flowering, maximum vine vigor was observed upon addition of 100 g N/vine. This effect was no longer evident after flowering. Those vines supplemented with 100 g of nitrogen also achieved maximum petiole nitrate concentrations at flowering, growth (shoot length, pruning weight, and leaf area), and canopy density (leaf layer number). Vines receiving 400 g N/vine had shorter shoots and less pruning weight than vines receiving 100 g N/vine, as vigor did not respond to nitrogen fertilizer prior to flowering. However, the petiole nitrate concentration, total leaf area, and canopy density of vines supplied with 200 to 400 g N/vine were no different to those vines supplemented with 100 g N/vine. Nitrogen had no effect on the total vine yield in the first and last season. However, the highest yield came from vines receiving 100 g N/vine in the second season. Additional applications of 200 g and 400 g N/vine increased the yield no further. Higher berry numbers per bunch were associated with the increase in total vine yield. It appeared that moderate rates of nitrogen fertilization can have a beneficial effect on vine productivity in situations where vine nitrogen status is low. In contrast, excessive nitrogen fertilization was an unprofitable exercise as it provided no further benefits in terms of vine productivity.

Key words: grapevine, nitrogen, fertilization, growth, canopy density, yield

Submitted on November 24, 1998




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
R. Morlat
Long-Term Additions of Organic Amendments in a Loire Valley Vineyard on a Calcareous Sandy Soil. II. Effects on Root System, Growth, Grape Yield, and Foliar Nutrient Status of a Cabernet franc Vine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2008; 59(4): 364 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.