AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:4:461-465 (1999)
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butzke, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebeler, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Butzke, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebeler, S. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Butzke, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebeler, S. E.

Survey of Analytical Methods and Winery Laboratory Proficiency

C. E. Butzke 1 and S. E. Ebeler 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8749, USA.

cebutzke{at}ucdavis.edu

Results of a survey of methods of analysis for five basic measurements of wine composition (pH, titratable acidity, volatile acidity, ethanol, and residual sugar) used in commercial winery laboratories are reported. A laboratory proficiency test was conducted with cooperating wineries for the same measurements. The proficiency test showed satisfactory results for the analysis of pH and ethanol in wine with coefficients of variation between wineries of 1.2% and 1.8%, respectively. Less than 20% of the wineries were proficient in measuring titratable acidity or volatile acidity. The range of reported volatile acidity concentrations varied more than two-fold. The analysis for residual sugar yielded unsatisfactory results, with a coefficient of variation of 140% and reported values ranging from 0.01 to 4.0 g/L. The results of this preliminary proficiency test suggested a need for improved laboratory quality management systems, especially with respect to analytical method standardization and validation, and for the establishment of proficiency testing program for American wineries. An "ASEV Winery Laboratory Quality Systems" CD-ROM was developed to guide wineries from the first steps of setting up a quality management system all the way to winery lab accreditation, and a continuous and frequent inter-laboratory proficiency testing scheme has been established.

Key words: wine analysis, winery laboratory, quality systems, proficiency testing, collaborative testing, method validation, ISO 17025, ISO Guide 43, wine quality

Submitted on October 13, 1998
Revised on March 9, 1999







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.