AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52:1:1-7 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergqvist, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ebisuda, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bergqvist, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ebisuda, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bergqvist, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ebisuda, N.

Sunlight Exposure and Temperature Effects on Berry Growth and Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California

Juliet Bergqvist 1, Nick Dokoozlian 1, and Nona Ebisuda 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis and the University of California Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648

email:nkdokoozlian{at}uckac.edu

The effects of sunlight exposure on the berry growth and composition of two red wine grape cultivars grown in the central San Joaquin Valley of California (Region V) were examined. Field grown Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache grape clusters were grown over a range of sunlight exposures (mid-day PAR <10 µmol m-2 sec-1 [shaded] to >600 µmol m-2 sec-1 [fully exposed]) from berry set to harvest. Both cultivars were planted in east-west oriented rows, and experimental clusters were evenly distributed between the north (afternoon shaded) and south (afternoon exposed) sides of the canopy. Fruit response to sunlight varied based on cluster location within the canopy, and these results were at least partially due to measured differences in berry temperature. At the same exposure level or PAR (photosynthetically active radiation), mid-day berry temperature was generally 3 to 4°C greater for clusters on the south side of the canopy compared to clusters on the north. Soluble solids initially increased with greater sunlight exposure, then declined when mid-day PAR exceeded 31 to 50 and 51 to 100 µmol m-2 sec-1, respectively, for clusters on the north and south sides of the canopy. Titratable acidity generally declined as sunlight exposure increased, with Cabernet Sauvignon clusters on the north side of the canopy maintaining greater acidity at the same exposure level than clusters on the south. Juice pH declined as exposure increased on the north side of the canopy, while sunlight had little effect on juice pH for clusters on the south. Anthocyanins increased linearly as sunlight exposure on the north side of the canopy increased, but declined when cluster exposure on the south exceeded 100µmol m-2 sec-1. Total phenolics generally followed a similar pattern. The results suggest that the effects of light on fruit composition are heavily dependent upon the extent to which berry temperature is elevated as a result of increased sunlight exposure. Prolonged exposure of clusters to direct sunlight should be avoided for maximum berry color in the central San Joaquin Valley and other warm regions.

Note:
Acknowledgment: The authors wish to thank the American Vineyard Foundation, Oakville, CA, for providing funding for this study.

Key words: sunlight exposure, fruit composition




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. T. Matus, R. Loyola, A. Vega, A. Pena-Neira, E. Bordeu, P. Arce-Johnson, and J. A. Alcalde
Post-veraison sunlight exposure induces MYB-mediated transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin and flavonol synthesis in berry skins of Vitis vinifera
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(3): 853 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. Louarn, J. Lecoeur, and E. Lebon
A Three-dimensional Statistical Reconstruction Model of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Simulating Canopy Structure Variability within and between Cultivar/Training System Pairs
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1167 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
B. W. Zoecklein, T. K. Wolf, L. Pelanne, M. K. Miller, and S. S. Birkenmaier
Effect of Vertical Shoot-Positioned, Smart-Dyson, and Geneva Double-Curtain Training Systems on Viognier Grape and Wine Composition
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 11 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
S. Guidoni, A. Ferrandino, and V. Novello
Effects of Seasonal and Agronomical Practices on Skin Anthocyanin Profile of Nebbiolo Grapes
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
G. L. Hostetler, I. A. Merwin, M. G. Brown, and O. Padilla-Zakour
Influence of Geotextile Mulches on Canopy Microclimate, Yield, and Fruit Composition of Cabernet franc
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2007; 58(4): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
S.-H. Lee, M.-J. Seo, M. Riu, J. P. Cotta, D. E. Block, N. K. Dokoozlian, and S. E. Ebeler
Vine Microclimate and Norisoprenoid Concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes and Wines
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2007; 58(3): 291 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. Ezzahouani and L. E. Williams
Effect of Irrigation Amount and Preharvest Irrigation Cutoff Date on Vine Water Status and Productivity of Danlas Grapevines
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2007; 58(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. O. Downey, M. Mazza, and M. P. Krstic
Development of a Stable Extract for Anthocyanins and Flavonols from Grape Skin
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2007; 58(3): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. G. Reynolds, J. Schlosser, R. Power, R. Roberts, J. Willwerth, and C. de Savigny
Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musque
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2007; 58(1): 12 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
S. Poni, L. Casalini, F. Bernizzoni, S. Civardi, and C. Intrieri
Effects of Early Defoliation on Shoot Photosynthesis, Yield Components, and Grape Composition
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2006; 57(4): 397 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
S. Stamatiadis, D. Taskos, C. Tsadilas, C. Christofides, E. Tsadila, and J. S. Schepers
Relation of Ground-Sensor Canopy Reflectance to Biomass Production and Grape Color in Two Merlot Vineyards
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2006; 57(4): 415 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
C. Alcalde-Eon, E. Boido, F. Carrau, E. Dellacassa, and J. C. Rivas-Gonzalo
Pigment Profiles in Monovarietal Wines Produced in Uruguay
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2006; 57(4): 449 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. O. Downey, N. K. Dokoozlian, and M. P. Krstic
Cultural Practice and Environmental Impacts on the Flavonoid Composition of Grapes and Wine: A Review of Recent Research
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2006; 57(3): 257 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. G. Reynolds, T. Molek, and C. De Savigny
Timing of Shoot Thinning in Vitis vinifera: Impacts on Yield and Fruit Composition Variables
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2005; 56(4): 343 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.